Almost reaching the record of the woman who at 67 has become a mother, and matching a Romanian woman, we know of a new case.
This time it has happened in Austria, where a woman who has undergone fertilization in vitro has given birth at 66, five years after having had a child by the same procedure.
Again, the case of this repeat Austrian mother in her third age faces the same debate. Does she have more right to be a mother than her baby to have a mother throughout her life?
Should there be an age limit for fertility treatments? Where is the limit?
The point of view of the woman who exercises her right to have a baby is usually seen, which, I want to assume, will be taken care of, loved and will receive affection that is all a child needs and more than many young mothers offer, it is true .
But for how long? Is it enough even for a short time? When the children of these women turn 15 and are in full adolescence, when they need parents to guide and accompany them, their mothers will be over 80 years old.
It is very utopian, but as well as a person may be at 80, is he old enough to educate a teenage son? From the point of view of children, have you thought about your right to have a mother?
Because at most these children will have a mother until they are 25, at the most 30 years old, and the rest of their life what? And if we continue in that sense, he is also depriving his future grandchildren of having a grandmother.
I see sensible the limit between 50-55 years that, in general, suggest applying gynecologists to perform fertility treatments. It is one thing to be a mother at an advanced age and another to be a mother in the elderly.
I simply believe that life and the human body have a cycle and that there is an age to be a mother and another to be a grandmother. What do you think?
